Workshop: 3D Printing vs. Injection Moulding
A detailed breakdown of how the Sustainable Design Studio’s Injection Machines compare to 3D printers..
Introduction
In the world of manufacturing, two giants often go head-to-head: 3D printing and injection moulding. Both are powerful tools that offer unique advantages, but they also come with their own set of challenges. Whether you're a startup looking to bring a new product to life or an established company seeking to optimize production, choosing the right method is crucial.
3D printing, with its accessibility and flexibility, has revolutionized the way we think about creating prototypes and small batches. It’s the go-to for intricate designs and custom products, offering a low barrier to entry that has democratized manufacturing. On the other hand, injection moulding is the tried-and-true workhorse of the industry. It’s the method of choice for large-scale production, offering unparalleled speed and consistency once the mould is set.
In this blog, we’ll dive deep into the pros and cons of 3D printing and injection moulding, share some real-world comparisons, and help you determine which method is best suited for your project. Whether you’re crafting a single prototype or gearing up for mass production, understanding the strengths and limitations of each method will empower you to make the best decision for your needs.
What is the Difference?
-
3D Printing
3D printing, also known as additive manufacturing, is a process that builds objects layer by layer from a digital file. Unlike traditional manufacturing methods that often involve cutting away material from a solid block (subtractive manufacturing), 3D printing adds material only where it’s needed. This makes it incredibly versatile for creating complex geometries that would be impossible or highly impractical to achieve with other methods.
One of the standout features of 3D printing is its accessibility. With the cost of printers having dropped significantly in recent years, anyone from hobbyists to businesses can now prototype or even produce end-use parts with ease. The process is straightforward: design a model using CAD software, slice it into layers, and let the printer do the rest. This method shines in applications where customization is key, or where producing small batches is more economical than investing in costly tooling.
-
Injection Moulding
Injection molding, on the other hand, is a manufacturing process that has been a cornerstone of mass production for decades. It involves injecting molten material—typically plastic—into a mold, where it cools and solidifies into the desired shape. Once the mold is created, which can be a significant upfront investment, the process becomes highly efficient, producing parts quickly and consistently.
The strength of injection molding lies in its ability to produce large volumes of identical parts with high precision and excellent surface finishes. It’s the go-to method for industries requiring durable, high-quality components, such as automotive, consumer goods, and medical devices. Although the initial cost of creating a mold can be high, the per-unit cost drops dramatically as production scales, making it an ideal choice for large-scale manufacturing.
3D Printing: The Agile Innovator
Pros:
Customization & Complexity: 3D printing excels at creating intricate designs and highly customized parts. Because it builds objects layer by layer, it can produce complex geometries that would be nearly impossible to achieve with other manufacturing methods.
Low Barrier to Entry: The cost of 3D printers has dropped significantly, making this technology accessible to startups, small businesses, and even hobbyists. You can start creating with just a printer, some filament, and a design file.
Rapid Prototyping: 3D printing is perfect for prototyping new ideas quickly and efficiently. You can iterate designs in hours rather than days or weeks, allowing for faster development cycles.
Automation: Once a print job is started, it can run unattended, even overnight, maximizing production time and reducing the need for constant supervision.
Cons:
Limited Use of Recycled Materials: One of the significant drawbacks of 3D printing is its limited ability to utilize recycled materials. While there are recycled filaments available, they are costly, with even virgin plastic spool typically ranging from £17 to £25 per kilogram. Moreover, creating your own recycled filament that’s consistent and reliable enough for printing is a complex and challenging process.
Speed & Scalability: While 3D printing is great for small runs, it’s not ideal for mass production. Printing large quantities of parts can be slow and labour-intensive, especially if multiple printers are required.
Surface Finish & Strength: The layer-by-layer construction often leaves visible lines on the surface, which may require post-processing to smooth out. Additionally, parts made from 3D printing may not be as strong as those produced through injection molding, particularly if they have a hollow centre or are made from weaker materials.
Injection Moulding: The Industrial Workhorse
Pros:
Efficiency at Scale: Injection molding is unmatched when it comes to large-scale production. Once the mold is created, parts can be produced rapidly and at a very low cost per unit, making it the preferred method for high-volume manufacturing.
Superior Strength & Finish: Injection molded parts are often stronger and more durable because they’re made from a single shot of molten material, resulting in a solid, uniform structure. The surface finish is typically smooth, requiring little to no post-processing.
Use of Recycled Materials: Unlike 3D printing, injection molding can efficiently utilize recycled materials. Recycled plastic is not only more environmentally friendly but also significantly cheaper, costing around £1 to £2 per kilogram, and even less if sourced locally. This makes injection molding a more sustainable and cost-effective option, particularly for large-scale production.
Consistency & Precision: Injection molding delivers highly consistent and precise results, which is crucial for industries where exact tolerances are necessary, such as automotive, medical, and consumer electronics.
Cons:
High Initial Costs: The creation of the mold is expensive and time-consuming, making injection molding less ideal for low-volume runs or prototypes. This high upfront investment means it’s best suited for projects where hundreds or thousandsof identical parts are needed.
Design Constraints: Unlike 3D printing, injection molding imposes more restrictions on design. The process requires careful consideration of factors like part thickness, draft angles, and material flow to avoid defects like warping or sink marks. This can limit the creativity of the design process and increase the complexity of part development.
Injection moulding is 27x faster than 3d printing.
Real-World Test: 3D Printing vs. Injection Molding
To truly understand the strengths and limitations of 3D printing and injection molding, it’s essential to see how these methods perform in real-world scenarios. We put both techniques to the test by producing beads and combs—two products that offer a clear comparison of speed, quality, and cost.
The Bead Test
We kicked off our testing with a simple product: beads. These small items are easy to produce and offer a straightforward way to compare the efficiency of 3D printing and injection molding. To make the test fair, we ran both processes side by side. We loaded the 3D printer with filament, hit print on a batch of 12 beads with a 15% infill, and simultaneously began the injection molding process.
Over the course of about an hour, the Prusa 3D printer diligently worked to complete the 12 beads. In contrast, the Injection Mini molding machine was far quicker. By the time the 3D printer finished its run, the Injection Mini had produced 300 beads. This stark difference in output highlights the incredible efficiency of injection molding, especially when it comes to batch production.
The results of this test make it clear: if you’re looking to produce a high volume of parts quickly, injection moulding is the way to go. The time savings are significant, and when scaled up, this efficiency translates directly into cost savings as well.
The Comb Test
Next, we tested the production of combs, another item often discussed in manufacturing circles. To match the quality of our injection-molded combs, we set the 3D printer to 100% infill with 1.5mm layer lines, which resulted in a print time of 3 hours and 15 minutes per comb. In contrast, within the same timeframe, we were able to injection mold 42 combs. Even when reducing the 3D print infill to 30%—which would compromise the comb’s strength—the print time only dropped to 2 hours and 9 minutes per comb, while we could still injection mold 28 combs in that period.
This comparison highlights the efficiency of injection molding for batch production, where speed and cost per unit are critical factors. While 3D printing shines in customization and prototyping, it simply cannot match the pace of injection molding when it comes to producing large quantities of identical items.
What Should You Choose?
Criteria for Choosing Injection Molding
Production Volume: You plan to produce more than 100 units.
Cost Efficiency: You want to reduce per-unit costs in large-scale production.
Material Use: You prefer using cheaper, recycled plastics.
Part Strength: Your product requires high strength and durability.
Surface Finish: You need a smooth, professional finish with minimal post-processing.
Consistency: You require high precision and consistency across all units.
Speed: You need to produce parts quickly and in large quantities.
Sustainability: You aim to minimize material waste by reusing scrap plastics.
Criteria for Choosing 3D Printing
Customization: You need highly personalized or intricate designs.
Prototyping: You want to quickly iterate and test multiple versions of a design.
Low Volume: Your production run is fewer than 100 units.
Budget: You have a limited budget and need to avoid high upfront costs.
Material Variety: You want to experiment with different materials, including speciality filaments.
Flexibility: You require the ability to modify designs quickly and easily between prints.
Small Batch Production: You are producing one-off items or small quantities.
Conclusion
When it comes to choosing between 3D printing and injection molding, the decision ultimately depends on your specific needs and production goals. Both methods have their unique strengths, but they also come with distinct trade-offs that should be carefully considered.
3D printing shines in areas where customization, prototyping, and small-batch production are key. Its low barrier to entry and the flexibility it offers make it a fantastic option for startups, small businesses, and anyone looking to quickly iterate on designs. However, it falls short when it comes to cost-effectively producing large volumes, especially when considering the high price of filament—£17 to £25 per kilogram for virgin plastic—and the significant time investment required for each print.
On the other hand, injection molding is the heavyweight champion of mass production. Although the initial startup costs are higher—primarily due to the need for creating molds and purchasing an injection molding machine—the long-term benefits are clear. Recycled plastic, which can be sourced for as little as £1 to £2 per kilogram, or even less if collected locally, significantly reduces material costs. Furthermore, the speed and efficiency of injection molding make it ideal for producing large quantities of consistent, high-quality parts. In our tests, we found that to match the production volume of our injection molding setup, you would need to invest in around 35 3D printers, which would cost nearly £28,000—a stark contrast to the £6,700 spent on our injection molding setup.
Additionally, for those in need of an option that balances cost and flexibility, hybrid molds such as resin molds offer an interesting middle ground. These 3D-printed resin molds are relatively inexpensive to create and are particularly useful for producing 100-200 units. While they lack the durability and cooling efficiency of traditional aluminum molds, they are perfect for short runs or prototyping when you need more than what a 3D printer can handle but aren't ready to invest in full-scale injection molding. However, it’s important to note that resin molds have their limitations—they can deteriorate after about 100 injections, and the softer material may require more post-processing.
Ultimately, if your project involves producing a large number of identical items, especially with an eye toward sustainability and cost efficiency, injection molding is likely the better choice. However, if your focus is on prototyping, one-off designs, or small production runs, 3D printing offers the flexibility and affordability you need. And for those in-between projects, hybrid molds might just be the perfect solution to bridge the gap between these two powerful manufacturing methods.
In many cases, these methods can work together harmoniously. You can use 3D printing for prototyping and design validation, then switch to injection molding—or even hybrid molds—for full-scale production. By understanding the strengths and limitations of each process, you can make an informed decision that best suits your manufacturing needs.
Related Resources.
-
![]()
Mould Use
Everything you need to know about how to use our moulds and deal with common problems.
-
![]()
How To Inject PLA
How to convert 3D printing waste into eco-friendly products with our injection mini
-
![]()
How to 3D Print FDM Moulds
A guide on how to 3D print a mould using FDM printing and what you need to do it yourself.
-
![]()
How to 3D Print SLA Moulds
A guide on how to 3D print a SLA mould, including what you need to purchase, and the full process of doing it yourself.
-
![]()
Good Product Design
A comprehensive guide to what makes a good, and bad recycled product.
